Accreditation bodies don't care that your data is in twelve spreadsheets
One session. We map your CLO/PLO gaps, CQI bottlenecks, and evidence trails before the next audit cycle hits.
Accreditation is a lagging indicator of a quality system that either works — or doesn't. We build the infrastructure that makes quality continuous, visible, and defensible long before the review board arrives.
Your institution runs OBE. Your data doesn't.
Most institutions have adopted OBE in policy. Few have closed the gap between policy and operational reality. When CLO attainment lives in faculty spreadsheets, CQI actions exist only in meeting minutes, and evidence packages are assembled under accreditation deadline pressure — the quality system is theater, not infrastructure. Accreditors are increasingly sophisticated enough to tell the difference.
Where We Automate Academic Quality
We automate the three highest-friction points in the OBE cycle — the ones that consume the most faculty time and produce the least defensible evidence.
Live CLO/PLO Attainment Infrastructure
Course outcomes map to program outcomes automatically. Attainment data flows in real time across terms, cohorts, and departments — giving quality teams a continuous signal instead of a semester-end scramble.
Assessment Analytics That Drive Action
Student performance data, item-level assessment results, and course analytics are consolidated into one decision layer. Interventions happen at term midpoint — not after it's too late to act.
CQI and Evidence Automation
Corrective action workflows, improvement cycle tracking, and evidence packaging are built into the system — not assembled retroactively before an accreditation visit.
Who Gains — and How
Every stakeholder in the quality chain gets a faster signal and a clearer path to action.
Deans and Accreditation Offices
Real-time program health dashboards replace end-of-cycle surprises. When a reviewer asks for evidence, it's already packaged — not pending faculty follow-up.
Department Heads and Program Coordinators
Live attainment data surfaces which courses are pulling program outcomes down — and where curriculum realignment will have the highest impact before the next term begins.
Faculty and Quality Assurance Teams
Structured input workflows reduce the reporting burden without reducing evidence quality. Faculty spend time teaching — the system captures what accreditors need.
Proof From Live Automation Builds
Track OBE was built for institutions that have committed to genuine continuous quality improvement — not just accreditation compliance — and need the operational infrastructure to deliver it at scale.
Track OBE
The continuous quality infrastructure that turns OBE from a compliance exercise into a competitive academic differentiator.
Track OBE replaces the fragmented, manual OBE reporting cycle with a continuous quality infrastructure: live outcomes mapping, automated attainment analytics, structured CQI workflows, and evidence management that keeps institutions audit-ready every day of the year — not just during review season.
